Skip to main content

APPOINT: a study of complement inhibitor–naive adults with PNH1

With FABHALTA oral monotherapy, substantial Hb improvements without the need for RBC transfusions are within reach

.

PRIMARY END POINT
 

Patients with sustained Hb increase of ≥2 g/dL* from baseline in the absence of RBC transfusions after the 24-week core treatment period

Response rate based on central laboratory Hb values. 77.5% FABHALTA (n=31/40; 95% CI, 61.5-89.2)

*Assessed between Day 126 and 168.1   
Assessed between Day 14 and 168. Requiring RBCs refers to any patient receiving transfusions or meeting protocol-defined criteria.

Results at week 48. 92.5% of patients achieved an Hb increase of ≥2 g/dL from baseline in the absence of RBC transfusions between Week 2 and 48

Based on observed and central laboratory data only. Assessed at a single Week 48 (Day 336) visit. Patients who received transfusions between Day 14 and 336 or were missing Day 336 assessment were considered nonresponders.3
§Assessed at a single visit at Week 48 (Day 336).3
The 'n' values reflect patients who responded based on observed data.3

Higher Hb levels in the absence of RBC transfusions are within reach1 
                         

FABHALTA is the first PNH treatment to evaluate a primary end point of the response rate of patients achieving sustained Hb increase of ≥2 g/dL, as opposed to Hb stabilization4-6

Patients taking FABHALTA experienced an increase in adjusted mean Hb level of +4.29 g/dL from baseline

ADDITIONAL END POINTS

Patients experienced increases in mean Hb by Week 1, with increases through Week 242,7

Mean Hb levels (g/dL) through Week 24 (values within 30 days of transfusion excluded and are considered missing) 

FABHALTA (n=40). +4.29 g/dL (95% CI, 3.86-4.72) adjusted mean increase in Hb from baseline. Adjusted mean assessed between Weeks 18 and 24*; excludes values within 30 days post-transfusion.

The data from this additional analysis are exploratory; therefore, not subject to family-wise Type 1 error control, and presented for observation only. No formal conclusions can be made.

Click on image to enlarge. 

Sustained Hb levels of ≥12 g/dL* in the absence of RBC transfusions after 24 weeks was observed in 47.5% of patients (n=19/40; 95% CI, 31.5-63.9)9

*Assessed between Day 126 and 168.9
Assessed between Day 14 and 168. Requiring RBCs refers to any patient receiving transfusions or meeting protocol-defined criteria.9

Results at week 48. The data from this additional analysis are exploratory; therefore, not subject to family-wise Type 1 error control, and presented for observation only. No formal conclusions can be made. Patients who continued taking FABHALTA experienced an adjusted mean change in Hb levels from baseline of +5.03 g/dL. Patients with Hb ≥12 g/dL in the absence of RBC transfusions between Week 2 and 48: 77.5%

RBC transfusion avoidance with FABHALTA over the 24-week treatment period

ADDITIONAL END POINT

The data from this additional analysis are exploratory; therefore, not subject to family-wise Type 1 error control, and presented for observation only. No formal conclusions can be made.

Patients achieving RBC transfusion avoidance assessed between Week 2 and 249

Click on image to enlarge. 

In the 6 months before trial enrollment, 70% (n=28/40) of patients required a transfusion.2 Transfusion avoidance in APPOINT was defined as absence of administration of packed-RBC transfusions between Day 14 and 168.9

Results at week 48. The data from this additional analysis are exploratory; therefore, not subject to family-wise Type 1 error control, and presented for observation only. No formal conclusions can be made. Patients who continued taking FABHALTA in the 24-week extension period of the APPOINT trial experiences and RBC transfusion avoidance** rate of 97.5%


 

“PNH is physically and mentally draining, but I’m grateful for FABHALTA. I used to require… blood transfusions.” – FABHALTA patient. Compensated for their time by Novartis. Individual results may vary.

The impact of FABHALTA on LDH and ARC levels

ADDITIONAL END POINTS     

The data from this additional analysis are exploratory; therefore, not subject to family-wise Type 1 error control, and presented for observation only. No formal conclusions can be made.

Absolute reticulocyte count (ARC) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) are 2 of the known biomarkers of hemolytic activity. ARC is a marker of both IVH and EVH, while LDH primarily reflects IVH.10-12
 

Adjusted mean change from baseline in LDH2,9,‖‖

Click on image to enlarge.

‖‖Mean of visits between Day 126 and 168.2  
¶¶Day 7.2        
##Day 14.2         
***Day 168.2     
 

Adjusted mean change from baseline in ARC2,9,‖‖

Click on image to enlarge.

‖‖Mean of visits between Days 126 and 168.2

Results at week 48. The data from this additional analysis are exploratory; therefore, not subject to family-wise Type 1 error control, and presented for observation only. At Week 48, the adjusted mean change in ARC from baseline was -76.78 x 10^9/L. At Week 48, the adjusted mean change in LDH from baseline was -83.05%

With FABHALTA, the adjusted mean change from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue score was +10.8

ADDITIONAL END POINT

Patient-reported FACIT-Fatigue scores may be an underestimation or overestimation because patients were not blinded to treatment.

The data from this additional analysis are exploratory; therefore, not subject to family-wise Type 1 error control, and presented for observation only. Due to the exploratory nature, small sample size, single-arm and open-label design, no formal conclusions can be made.

  • Assessed between Week 18 and 24. The adjusted mean change* from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue score§§§ in patients taking FABHALTA was +10.8 (95% CI, 8.63-12.95)2,9

Click on image to enlarge.

  • In separate, large-scale surveys, the mean FACIT-Fatigue score for the general population was 4413,14,¶¶¶

*Assessed between Day 126 and 168.2
§§§The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) is a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. The level of fatigue is measured on a 4-point Likert scale (in the study, 4=not at all fatigued to 0=very much fatigued), with 0 being the worst possible score and 52 the best.2
‖‖‖Baseline mean FACIT-Fatigue scores and adjusted mean change in FACIT-Fatigue scores at Day 168 were reported for 40 patients.2  
¶¶¶The FACIT-Fatigue score for the general population was determined through the assessment of 1010 adults in the US in 2002 and 2426 adults in Germany in 2018.13,14

Patient-reported FACIT-Fatigue scores may be an underestimation or overestimation because patients were not blinded to treatment. The data from this additional analysis are exploratory; therefore, not subject to family-wise Type 1 error control, and presented for observation only. Patients who continued taking FABHALTA in the 24-week extension period of the APPOINT trial experienced an adjusted mean change in FACIT-Fatigue score from baseline of +10.90

Explore the safety profile for FABHALTA

See how adult patients take FABHALTA

Start adult patients on FABHALTA

Definitions  
ARC, absolute reticulocyte count; CI, confidence interval; EVH, extravascular hemolysis; FACIT-Fatigue, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue; HB, hemoglobin; IVH, intravascular emolysis; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PNH, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria; RBC, red blood cell; ULN, upper limit of normal.

References  
1. Fabhalta. Prescribing information. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
2. Data on file. Study CLNP023C12301 CSR. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp; 2022.
3. Data on file. Study CLNP023C1 APPLY-PNH and APPOINT-PNH 48-Week Analysis Supporting the USPI Clinical Efficacy Section. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp; 2024.
4. Empaveli. Prescribing information. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
5. Soliris. Prescribing information. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
6. Ultomiris. Prescribing information. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
7. Data on file. LNP023 (Iptacopan) Clinical Trial Protocol CLNP023C12302 Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp; 2022.
8. Cappellini MD, Motta I. Anemia in clinical practice-definition and classification: does hemoglobin change with aging? Semin Hematol. 2015;52(4):261-269. doi:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2015.07.006 
9. Data on file. Study CLNP023C12301 and Study CLNP023C12302 supporting analyses for USPI clinical efficacy section. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp; 2023.
10. Brodsky RA. Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Blood. 2014;124(18):2804-2811. doi:10.1182/blood-2014-02-522128
11. Risitano AM, Notaro R, Marando L, et al. Complement fraction 3 binding on erythrocytes as additional mechanism of disease in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria patients treated by eculizumab. Blood. 2009;113(17):4094-4100. doi:10.1182/blood-2008-11-18994413
12. Sahin F, Akay OM, Ayer M, et al. Pesg PNH diagnosis, follow-up and treatment guidelines. Am J Blood Res. 2016;6(2):19-27.
13. Cella D, Lai JS, Chang CH, Peterman A, Slavin M. Fatigue in cancer patients compared with fatigue in the general United States population. Cancer. 2002;94(2):528-538. doi:10.1002/cncr.1024
14. Montan I, Lowe B, Cella D, Mehnert A, Hinz A. General population norms for the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-fatigue scale. Value Health. 2018;21(11):1313-1321. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.013 23